On 2019-01-17 21:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:55:17PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
Hi Matthias,
On 2019-01-17 01:52, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> - /* Wait for 100 uS for SoC to settle down */
>> - usleep_range(100, 200);
>> + serdev_device_wait_until_sent(hu->serdev, timeout);
>> + /* Wait of 5ms is required for assuring to send the byte on the Tx
>> + * line and also for the controller to settle down for the received
>> + * byte.
>> + */
>> + usleep_range(5000, 6000);
>
> I incorrectly claimed that there might be still bytes sitting in the
> UART FIFO when serdev_device_wait_until_sent() returns, Johan
> corrected me on that (thanks!). So if it takes the SoC 100us to settle
> down we should be good with the original code.
[Bala]: sure will revert, i think he commented that wait_until_sent()
will only guarantee circular buffer is empty. if wait_until_sent()
guarantee us that the data was transmitted from the FIFO, then 100us
will work.
No, Matthias is correct; I claimed that the UART FIFO will be empty (at
least as long as flow control is disabled, otherwise it may never empty
and we therefore also have a time out).
Johan
[Bala]: Thanks Johan for clarification.
--
Regards
Balakrishna.
