Hi Douglas, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on robclark/msm-next] [also build test ERROR on v5.0-rc1 next-20190111] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/drm-msm-Fix-A6XX-support-for-opp-level/20190114-004951 base: git://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux msm-next config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=arm All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c: In function 'a6xx_gmu_get_arc_level': >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c:964:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_pm_opp_get_level'; did you mean 'dev_pm_opp_get_freq'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] val = dev_pm_opp_get_level(opp); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dev_pm_opp_get_freq cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +964 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c 949 950 /* Return the 'arc-level' for the given frequency */ 951 static unsigned int a6xx_gmu_get_arc_level(struct device *dev, 952 unsigned long freq) 953 { 954 struct dev_pm_opp *opp; 955 unsigned int val; 956 957 if (!freq) 958 return 0; 959 960 opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq, true); 961 if (IS_ERR(opp)) 962 return 0; 963 > 964 val = dev_pm_opp_get_level(opp); 965 966 dev_pm_opp_put(opp); 967 968 return val; 969 } 970 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
