Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@xxxxxxxxx>, Joao Pinto <jpinto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:54:21 +0100
Cc: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, MSM <linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SCSI <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA52659@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <3bf7ea8e-4cf2-1f9b-7f46-15609dfcad19@free.fr> <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA52659@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 13/12/2018 23:34, Winkler, Tomas wrote:

> On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> 
>> Fixes: ba80917d9932d ("scsi: ufs: ufshcd_dump_regs to use memcpy_fromio")
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx>
>
> LGTM

Vinayak, Joao,

What do you think?

Regards.

References:
- [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs
  - From: Marc Gonzalez
- RE: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs
  - From: Winkler, Tomas

Prev by Date: [PATCH v6 3/6] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix frame reassembly errors for wcn3990
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] Bluetooth: hci_qca: use wait_until_sent() for power pulses
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: Use explicit access size in ufshcd_dump_regs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [Linux for Sparc] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]