Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:09 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:49 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 18-12-18, 11:05, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > OK, it's fine with me to have the fallback, but if we do we should be
> > > consistent about it and make sure it's in all the bindings and device
> > > tree files...
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> > I am not sure what's the right way to do it is, i.e. should we keep the
> > "operating-points-v2" string or not.
>
> Does having it buy you anything? Given the QCom one doesn't have any
> frequency or voltage, I don't see how it would be useful to have it.
...but it does have a frequency, doesn't it?
+ compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level";
+
+ opp-710000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <710000000>;
+ qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L1>;
+ };
-Doug
