On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 12:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:46:57PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > When the hierarchical CPU topology is used and when a CPU has been put
> > offline (hotplug), that same CPU prevents its PM domain and thus also
> > potential master PM domains, from being powered off. This is because genpd
> > observes the CPU's struct device to remain being active from a runtime PM
> > point of view.
> >
> > To deal with this, let's decrease the runtime PM usage count by calling
> > pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() of the CPU's struct device when putting it
> > offline. Consequentially, we must then increase the runtime PM usage for
> > the CPU, while putting it online again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v10:
> > - Make it work when the hierarchical CPU topology is used, which may be
> > used both for OSI and PC mode.
> > - Rework the code to prevent "BUG: sleeping function called from
> > invalid context".
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > index b03bccce0a5d..f62c4963eb62 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > #include <linux/linkage.h>
> > @@ -199,9 +200,20 @@ static int psci_cpu_suspend(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point)
> >
> > static int psci_cpu_off(u32 state)
> > {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > int err;
> > u32 fn;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * When the hierarchical CPU topology is used, decrease the runtime PM
> > + * usage count for the current CPU, as to allow other parts in the
> > + * topology to enter low power states.
> > + */
> > + if (psci_dt_topology) {
> > + dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id());
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF];
> > err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, state, 0, 0);
> > return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
> > @@ -209,6 +221,7 @@ static int psci_cpu_off(u32 state)
> >
> > static int psci_cpu_on(unsigned long cpuid, unsigned long entry_point)
> > {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > int err;
> > u32 fn;
> >
> > @@ -216,6 +229,13 @@ static int psci_cpu_on(unsigned long cpuid, unsigned long entry_point)
> > err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, cpuid, entry_point, 0);
> > /* Clear the domain state to start fresh. */
> > psci_set_domain_state(0);
> > +
> > + /* Increase runtime PM usage count if the hierarchical CPU toplogy. */
> > + if (!err && psci_dt_topology) {
> > + dev = get_cpu_device(cpuid);
>
> I do not like adding this code in the cpu_{on/off} method themselves, I will
> have a look at the patchset as whole to see how we can restructure it.
Any suggestions are welcome, of course. This was the best and most
simple option I could come up with.
Another option, could be to simply to remove the runtime PM deployment
from psci_cpu_off|on() altogether and just live with that limitation
for now. That works for me as well.
>
> More to the point, using cpuid as a logical cpu id is wrong, it is a
> physical id that you should convert to a logical id through
> get_logical_index().
Oh, didn't know that, thanks for pointing that out!
>
> Lorenzo
>
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Kind regards
Uffe
