On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 10:53, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 29/11/2018 18:46, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > To enable a device belonging to a CPU to be attached to a PM domain managed > > by genpd, let's do a few changes to it, as to make it convenient to manage > > the specifics around CPUs. > > > > To be able to quickly find out what CPUs that are attached to a genpd, > > which typically becomes useful from a genpd governor as following changes > > is about to show, let's add a cpumask to the struct generic_pm_domain. At > > the point when a CPU device gets attached to a genpd, let's update its > > cpumask. Moreover, let's also propagate changes to the cpumask upwards in > > the topology to the master PM domains. In this way, the cpumask for a genpd > > hierarchically reflects all CPUs attached to the topology below it. > > > > Finally, let's make this an opt-in feature, to avoid having to manage CPUs > > and the cpumask for a genpd that doesn't need it. For that reason, let's > > add a new genpd configuration bit, GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN. > > > > Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v10: > > - Don't allocate the cpumask when not used. > > - Simplify the code that updates the cpumask. > > - Document the GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN. > > > > --- > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 13 ++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > index e27b91d36a2a..c3ff8e395308 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > > #include <linux/sched.h> > > #include <linux/suspend.h> > > #include <linux/export.h> > > +#include <linux/cpu.h> > > > > #include "power.h" > > > > @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ static const struct genpd_lock_ops genpd_spin_ops = { > > #define genpd_is_irq_safe(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE) > > #define genpd_is_always_on(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON) > > #define genpd_is_active_wakeup(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP) > > +#define genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd) (genpd->flags & GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN) > > > > static inline bool irq_safe_dev_in_no_sleep_domain(struct device *dev, > > const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > @@ -1377,6 +1379,56 @@ static void genpd_free_dev_data(struct device *dev, > > dev_pm_put_subsys_data(dev); > > } > > > > +static void __genpd_update_cpumask(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, > > + int cpu, bool set, unsigned int depth) > > +{ > > + struct gpd_link *link; > > + > > + if (!genpd_is_cpu_domain(genpd)) > > + return; > > With this test, we won't continue updating the cpumask for the other > masters. Is it done on purpose ? Correct, and yes it's on purpose. We are not even allocating the cpumask for the genpd in question, unless it has the GENPD_FLAG_CPU_DOMAIN set. [...] Kind regards Uffe