On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 05:31:53PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:55:57AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > The actions SMP implementation has several issues: > > > > 1. pen_release is only ever read and compared to -1, and is defined in > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c to be -1. This test will always succeed. > > > > 2. we are already guaranteed to be single threaded while bringing up a > > CPU, so the spinlock makes no sense, remove it. > > > > 3. owl_secondary_startup() is not referenced nor defined, the prototype > > is redundant, remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Russel, > > Is this patch a superset of https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg694546.html? Probably not, I couldn't find which platform Linus had already done in my mailbox, so I just did those that I could see in the kernel tree. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
