Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add dpu to sdm845 dts file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 07:25:23PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> DPU is short for the Display Processing Unit. It is the display
> controller on Qualcomm SDM845 chips.
> 
> This change adds MDSS and DSI nodes to enable display on the
> target device.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	 - Beefed up commit message
> 	 - Use SoC specific compatibles for mdss and dpu (Rob H)
> 	 - Use assigned-clocks to set initial clock frequency(Rob H)
> Changes in v3:
> 	 - added IOMMU node
> 	 - Fix device naming (remove _phys)
> 	 - Use correct IRQ_TYPE in interrupt specifiers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 191 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 0c9a2aa..dd612ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -978,6 +978,197 @@
>  			#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>  		};
>  
> +		mdss: mdss@ae00000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mdss";
> +			reg = <0xae00000 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "mdss";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&dispcc 0>;

Would the powers-that-be in the power domain prefer this to have a symbolic
value? I see MDSS_GDSC in the bindings header.

> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_DISP_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "iface", "bus", "core";
> +
> +			assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>;
> +			assigned-clock-rates = <300000000>;
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x880 0x8>,
> +			         <&apps_smmu 0xc80 0x8>;
> +
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <1>;
> +			ranges;
> +
> +			mdss_mdp: mdp@ae01000 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dpu";
> +				reg = <0x0ae01000 0x8f000>,
> +				      <0x0aeb0000 0x2008>;
> +				reg-names = "mdp", "vbif";
> +
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "iface", "bus", "core", "vsync";
> +
> +				assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
> +						  <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
> +				assigned-clock-rates = <300000000>,
> +						       <19200000>;
> +
> +				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> +				interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> +				ports {
> +					#address-cells = <1>;
> +					#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +					port@0 {
> +						reg = <0>;
> +						dpu_intf1_out: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_in>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +
> +					port@1 {
> +						reg = <1>;
> +						dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&dsi1_in>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dsi0: dsi@ae94000 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
> +				reg = <0xae94000 0x400>;
> +				reg-names = "dsi_ctrl";
> +
> +				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> +				interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_INTF_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK0_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC0_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AXI_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "byte_clk",
> +					      "byte_intf_clk",
> +					      "pixel_clk",
> +					      "core_clk",
> +					      "iface_clk",
> +					      "bus_clk";

We will need to remove  the _clk extension and fix the code if needed.

> +
> +				phys = <&dsi0_phy>;
> +				phy-names = "dsi-phy";

This too, I reckon.

> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				ports {
> +					#address-cells = <1>;
> +					#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +					port@0 {
> +						reg = <0>;
> +						dsi0_in: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf1_out>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +
> +					port@1 {
> +						reg = <1>;
> +						dsi0_out: endpoint {
> +						};
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dsi0_phy: dsi-phy@ae94400 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-10nm";
> +				reg = <0xae94400 0x200>,
> +				      <0xae94a00 0x1e0>,
> +				      <0xae94600 0x280>;

I think it would be better if these were in numerical order.

> +				reg-names = "dsi_phy",
> +					    "dsi_pll",
> +					    "dsi_phy_lane";
> +
> +				#clock-cells = <1>;
> +				#phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "iface_clk";

Remove _clk extension.

> +			};
> +
> +			dsi1: dsi@ae96000 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
> +				reg = <0xae96000 0x400>;
> +				reg-names = "dsi_ctrl";
> +
> +				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> +				interrupts = <5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_INTF_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK1_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC1_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AXI_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "byte_clk",
> +					      "byte_intf_clk",
> +					      "pixel_clk",
> +					      "core_clk",
> +					      "iface_clk",
> +					      "bus_clk";

And here.

> +
> +				phys = <&dsi1_phy>;
> +				phy-names = "dsi-phy";

And here.

> +
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				ports {
> +					#address-cells = <1>;
> +					#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +					port@0 {
> +						reg = <0>;
> +						dsi1_in: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf2_out>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +
> +					port@1 {
> +						reg = <1>;
> +						dsi1_out: endpoint {
> +						};
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
> +			dsi1_phy: dsi-phy@ae96400 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-10nm";
> +				reg = <0xae96400 0x200>,
> +				      <0xae96a00 0x10e>,
> +				      <0xae96600 0x280>;

Numerical order would be preferred.

> +				reg-names = "dsi_phy",
> +					    "dsi_pll",
> +					    "dsi_phy_lane";
> +
> +				#clock-cells = <1>;
> +				#phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "iface_clk";

And one more extension.

> +			};
> +		};
> +
>  		spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>  			reg = <0xc440000 0x1100>,

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux