Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:10 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:26:52PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Now that consumers all keep track of their own enable count, let's add
> > it into the regulator_summary.
>
> This patch series contains a bunch of random stuff that's not
> particularly related to each other or even dependent on each other -
> it's better to just send unrelated things in unrelated threads, it
> makes it clear what actual dependencies exist, makes the serieses that
> are sent easier to understand and stops things getting blocked on
> unrelated changes earlier in the series.
Sure. You want me to repost things now or wait until you've had a
chance to look things over?
Certainly patch #1 is totally self-contained.
regulator: core: Properly expose requested_microamps in sysfs
Patch #2 is self-contained but helps with confirming patches later in
the series:
regulator: core: Don't assume always_on when is_enabled returns err
Patch #3: self-contained but helps with confirming patches later in the series:
regulator: core: Don't double-disable supplies in regulator_disable_deferred()
Patches #4 and #5 are intimately tied. As per discussion, I'll squash
together for v2.
regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers
regulator: core: add enable_count for consumers to debug fs
Patch #6: wasn't originally self-contained when I wrote it 2 days ago,
but after commit f8702f9e4aa7 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for
regulators locking") it is.
regulator: core: Avoid propagating to supplies when possible
Patch #7: Now that I know you want to loop over use_count, depends on
patch #6 which changes how many times supplies are enabled.
regulator: core: Remove loop disabling supplies in regulator_force_disable()
I don't want to send v2 of things while you're still reviewing. If
you have a chance give me a ping when you're ready for me to send out
v2 of things. ...otherwise I'll plan to send it out later today or
tomorrow morning.
-Doug
