Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-11-14 14:24:43)
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:11:48PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2018-11-02 14:45:34)
> > > @@ -630,7 +632,8 @@ static int pll_10nm_register(struct dsi_pll_10nm *pll_10nm)
> > > char clk_name[32], parent[32], vco_name[32];
> > > char parent2[32], parent3[32], parent4[32];
> > > struct clk_init_data vco_init = {
> > > - .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
> > > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> > > + __clk_get_name(pll_10nm->vco_ref_clk) },
> >
> > I find this syntax odd, in addition to needing to check for NULL here as
> > Sean pointed out. Preferably just have it be the address of the
> > character pointer instead of making an anonymous array and then casting
> > that inline, i.e
> >
> > .parent_names = &ref_clk_name,
>
> Ok
>
> I'm not convinced the check for NULL is needed though, see my reply to Sean.
Ok! I'm fine either way on the NULL stuff.
