Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: Don't register the driver when back-end init returns -ENXIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:48:43PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> There's no point to register the cpuidle driver for the current CPU, when
> the initialization of the arch specific back-end data fails by returning
> -ENXIO.
> 
> Instead, let's re-order the sequence to its original flow, by first trying
> to initialize the back-end part and then act accordingly on the returned
> error code. Additionally, let's print the error message, no matter of what
> error code that was returned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Note, as far as I can tell it's only qcom-spm that may return -ENXIO, which also
> was original reason to why this error path was invented.
> 
> Unfurtunate I don't have a qcom spm platfrom at hand, however I manually tried
> this by hacking the PSCI driver to return -ENXIO for some CPUs. So I assume it
> should then also work for qcom spm.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> index 073557f433eb..df564d783216 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
> @@ -103,13 +103,6 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init_cpu(int cpu)
>  		goto out_kfree_drv;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		if (ret != -EBUSY)
> -			pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n");
> -		goto out_kfree_drv;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Call arch CPU operations in order to initialize
>  	 * idle states suspend back-end specific data
> @@ -117,15 +110,20 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init_cpu(int cpu)
>  	ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Skip the cpuidle device initialization if the reported
> +	 * Allow the initialization to continue for other CPUs, if the reported
>  	 * failure is a HW misconfiguration/breakage (-ENXIO).
>  	 */
> -	if (ret == -ENXIO)
> -		return 0;

I wonder whether moving the drv allocation and dt initialization after
arm_cpuidle_init(cpu) would simplify the error path; the patch makes sense
the error path is getting a bit hard to read - maybe we can simplify it.

I think, if you can single it out, it would be good to add a Fixes:
tag too.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> -
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu);
> -		goto out_unregister_drv;
> +		ret = ret == -ENXIO ? 0 : ret;
> +		goto out_kfree_drv;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (ret != -EBUSY)
> +			pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n");
> +		goto out_kfree_drv;
>  	}
>  
>  	dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux