The only reason that remains, to why the ARM cpuidle driver calls
cpuidle_register_driver(), is to avoid printing an error message in case
another driver already have been registered for the CPU. This seems a bit
silly, but more importantly, if that is a common scenario, perhaps we
should change cpuidle_register() accordingly instead.
In either case, let's consolidate the code, by converting to use
cpuidle_register|unregsiter(), which also avoids the unnecessary allocation
of the struct cpuidle_device.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 30 +++---------------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
index df564d783216..3a407a3ef22b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init_cpu(int cpu)
{
int ret;
struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
- struct cpuidle_device *dev;
drv = kmemdup(&arm_idle_driver, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!drv)
@@ -119,33 +118,12 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init_cpu(int cpu)
goto out_kfree_drv;
}
- ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
- if (ret) {
- if (ret != -EBUSY)
- pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n");
+ ret = cpuidle_register(drv, NULL);
+ if (ret)
goto out_kfree_drv;
- }
-
- dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!dev) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_unregister_drv;
- }
- dev->cpu = cpu;
-
- ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n",
- cpu);
- goto out_kfree_dev;
- }
return 0;
-out_kfree_dev:
- kfree(dev);
-out_unregister_drv:
- cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv);
out_kfree_drv:
kfree(drv);
return ret;
@@ -176,9 +154,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void)
while (--cpu >= 0) {
dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_devices, cpu);
drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
- cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
- cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv);
- kfree(dev);
+ cpuidle_unregister(drv);
kfree(drv);
}
--
2.17.1
