On Sun 30 Sep 08:56 PDT 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > rmtfs_mem provides access to physical storage and is crucial for the > operation of the Qualcomm modem subsystem. > > The rmtfs_mem implementation must be available before the modem > subsystem is booted and a solution where the modem remoteproc will > verify that the rmtfs_mem is available has been discussed in the past. > But this would not handle the case where the rmtfs_mem provider is > restarted, which would cause fatal loss of access to the storage device > for the modem. > > The suggestion is therefore to link the rmtfs_mem to its associated > remote processor instance and control it based on the availability of > the rmtfs_mem implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > [sibis: Added qmi lookup for Remote file system service] > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Sibi, This looks clean and straight forward, but I think the logic should be moved into the qcom_q6v5_mss driver itself - as we now only care about the QMI service being present, not the rmtfs_memory driver. There's nothing left of my original patch, so please credit yourself as author of v3. [..] > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rmtfs_mem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rmtfs_mem.c [..] > @@ -181,6 +217,22 @@ static int qcom_rmtfs_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > rmtfs_mem->client_id = client_id; > rmtfs_mem->size = rmem->size; > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "rproc", &rproc_phandle); > + if (!ret) { > + rmtfs_mem->rproc = rproc_get_by_phandle(rproc_phandle); > + if (!rmtfs_mem->rproc) > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > + } > + > + ret = qmi_handle_init(&rmtfs_mem->rmtfs_hdl, 0, > + &rmtfs_lookup_ops, NULL); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto put_rproc; > + > + ret = qmi_add_lookup(&rmtfs_mem->rmtfs_hdl, 14, 0, 0); The 14 here deserves a define and the whole thing would benefit from a comment describing the remoteproc's dependency on the RMTFS service being present. > + if (ret < 0) > + goto err_release_qmi_handle; > + > device_initialize(&rmtfs_mem->dev); > rmtfs_mem->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; > rmtfs_mem->dev.groups = qcom_rmtfs_mem_groups; Looking forward to v3! Regards, Bjorn