On 2018-10-07 23:04, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Sodagudi Prasad (2018-10-03 05:38:24)
for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++, gpio++) {
+ label = gpiochip_is_requested(chip, i);
+ if (!label)
+ continue;
msm_gpio_dbg_show_one(s, NULL, chip, i, gpio);
- seq_puts(s, "\n");
}
}
Does something not work with the following code in
msm_gpio_dbg_show_one()?
if (!gpiochip_line_is_valid(chip, offset))
return;
Hi Stephen,
I didnt realize that these changes are merged on tip. I was testing on
4.14 kernel.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878107/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878106/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/878109/
I will add "gpio-reserved-ranges" to internal platforms and this issue
should not be observed.
-thanks, Prasad
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
