Re: [PATCH 6/9] PM / OPP: dt-bindings: Add opp-interconnect-bw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10-10-18, 08:27, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> I'm not convinced that required-opps would work. I'm worried that the
> format is too vague if we need to use it for multiple paths and possibly
> other uses too, consider this:
> 
> required-opp = <&mdp_path0_opp3, &mdp_path1_opp5, &mdp_rpmh_opp1>;
> 
> This has ordering problems and IMO pollutes the DT namespace for no
> great technical advantage. I appreciate the hesitation for opening up
> the flood gates for new OPP bindings but we are entering a new era
> of hyper power aware devices and some concessions will need to be made.

Sure.

-- 
viresh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux