Re: [PATCH v16 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/08/18 15:45, Vivek Gautam wrote:
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
master's using it are active. The device_link feature
helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the
iommu gets powered when the master device enables itself
using pm_runtime. So by adapting the smmu driver for
runtime pm, above said dependency can be addressed.

This patch adds the pm runtime/sleep callbacks to the
driver and also the functions to parse the smmu clocks
from DT and enable them in resume/suspend.

Also, while we enable the runtime pm add a pm sleep suspend
callback that pushes devices to low power state by turning
the clocks off in a system sleep.
Also add corresponding clock enable path in resume callback.

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[vivek: rework for clock and pm ops]
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index fd1b80ef9490..d900e007c3c9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
  #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
  #include <linux/pci.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
  #include <linux/slab.h>
  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -205,6 +206,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
  	u32				num_global_irqs;
  	u32				num_context_irqs;
  	unsigned int			*irqs;
+	struct clk_bulk_data		*clks;
+	int				num_clks;
u32 cavium_id_base; /* Specific to Cavium */ @@ -1896,10 +1899,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
  struct arm_smmu_match_data {
  	enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
  	enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
+	const char * const *clks;
+	int num_clks;
  };
#define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp) \
-static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
+static const struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU);
  ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
@@ -1918,6 +1923,23 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
+static void arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+				   const char * const *clks)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (smmu->num_clks < 1)
+		return;
+
+	smmu->clks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, smmu->num_clks,
+				  sizeof(*smmu->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!smmu->clks)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_clks; i++)
+		smmu->clks[i].id = clks[i];
+}
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
  static int acpi_smmu_get_data(u32 model, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
  {
@@ -2000,6 +2022,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
  	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
  	smmu->version = data->version;
  	smmu->model = data->model;
+	smmu->num_clks = data->num_clks;
+
+	arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(smmu, data->clks);
parse_driver_options(smmu); @@ -2098,6 +2123,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		smmu->irqs[i] = irq;
  	}
+ err = devm_clk_bulk_get(smmu->dev, smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+

Hmm, if we error out beyond here it looks like we should strictly balance that prepare/enable before devres does the clk_bulk_put(), however the probe error path is starting to look like it needs a bit of love in general, so I might just spin a cleanup patch on top (and even then only for the sake of not being a bad example; SMMU probe failure is never a realistic situation for the system to actually recover from).

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

  	err = arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(smmu);
  	if (err)
  		return err;
@@ -2184,6 +2217,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Turn the thing off */
  	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
+
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -2192,15 +2228,50 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	arm_smmu_device_remove(pdev);
  }
-static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
  {
  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_enable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
+
  	return 0;
  }
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_pm_ops, NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume);
+static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	return arm_smmu_runtime_resume(dev);
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	return arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(dev);
+}
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops arm_smmu_pm_ops = {
+	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_pm_suspend, arm_smmu_pm_resume)
+	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_runtime_suspend,
+			   arm_smmu_runtime_resume, NULL)
+};
static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
  	.driver	= {




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux