On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:36:34AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Wang wrote:
> > > All checks for _dpu_crtc_power_enable are not true, so the function
> > > can never return an error code. All calls of the function have also
> > > been changed so that they don't expect a return value.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Wang <bzwang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 35 ++++--------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > > index a9adb16eac6f..648d77c41c3e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > > @@ -59,37 +59,16 @@ static inline struct dpu_kms *_dpu_crtc_get_kms(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > > ->kms);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline int _dpu_crtc_power_enable(struct dpu_crtc *dpu_crtc, bool enable)
> > > +static inline void _dpu_crtc_power_enable(struct dpu_crtc *dpu_crtc, bool enable)
> >
> > Since this is only two lines of code with the optimization below my personal
> > preference would be to turn this into two functions: _dpu_crtc_power_enable and
> > _dpu_crtc_power_disable. I find that to be more readable when walking through
> > the functional code.
>
> ...or just call the pm_runtime functions directly? If we can use
> _dpu_crtc_get_kms() it shouldn't be too nasty.
>
> Sean
>
It feels a little more clear to me with the two separate
_dpu_crtc_power_enable and
_dpu_crtc_power_disable functions. Sending out another patch set with
that change.
> >
> > > {
> > > - struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > - struct msm_drm_private *priv;
> > > - struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
> > > -
> > > - if (!dpu_crtc) {
> > > - DPU_ERROR("invalid dpu crtc\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - crtc = &dpu_crtc->base;
> > > - if (!crtc->dev || !crtc->dev->dev_private) {
> > > - DPU_ERROR("invalid drm device\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> > > - if (!priv->kms) {
> > > - DPU_ERROR("invalid kms\n");
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
> > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &dpu_crtc->base;
> > > + struct msm_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> > > + struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(priv->kms);
> >
> > I think all three of these can be replaced by
> >
> > struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_crtc_get_kms(&dpu_crtc->base);
> >
> > > if (enable)
> > > pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
> > > else
> > > pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void dpu_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > > @@ -822,14 +801,10 @@ static int _dpu_crtc_vblank_enable_no_lock(
> > > dev = crtc->dev;
> > >
> > > if (enable) {
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > /* drop lock since power crtc cb may try to re-acquire lock */
> > > mutex_unlock(&dpu_crtc->crtc_lock);
> > > - ret = _dpu_crtc_power_enable(dpu_crtc, true);
> > > + _dpu_crtc_power_enable(dpu_crtc, true);
> > > mutex_lock(&dpu_crtc->crtc_lock);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry(enc, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list, head) {
> > > if (enc->crtc != crtc)
> > > --
> > > 2.19.0.444.g18242da7ef-goog
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Freedreno mailing list
> > > Freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno
> >
> > --
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
