On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:16:46PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> On 2018-08-30 09:24, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:39:54PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
> > > Identify slave-master encoders during initialization and enable
> > > the encoders explicitly as the current logic has redundant and
> > > ambiguous loops.
> >
> > Please include a "Changes in vX" section so I don't need to figure it
> > out
> > myself.
> >
> Since I split these clean up changes into a new series, I was not sure
> how to handle the versioning. With "changes in v4" log, Should I also
> change the prefix labeling to [PATCH v4 05/14]? A couple of changes
> are also introduced in this series.
Yeah, sometimes it's best just to choose an arbitrarily high version if multiple
series' are coming together. In this case it's more simple since we're just
adding patches to the series, so v4 would have worked. As far as the new patches,
just add:
Changed in v4:
- Introduced patch (split from "blah blah")
or
Changed in v4:
- Introduced patch (suggested by Sean)
Sean
>
> Thanks,
> Jeykumar S.
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 46
> > ++++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> > > index 991b22c..b223bd2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> > > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_virt {
> > > unsigned int num_phys_encs;
> > > struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_encs[MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL];
> > > struct dpu_encoder_phys *cur_master;
> > > + struct dpu_encoder_phys *cur_slave;
> > > struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
> > >
> > > bool intfs_swapped;
> > > @@ -1141,7 +1142,8 @@ void dpu_encoder_virt_restore(struct drm_encoder
> > *drm_enc)
> > > static void dpu_encoder_virt_enable(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc)
> > > {
> > > struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc = NULL;
> > > - int i, ret = 0;
> > > + struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = NULL;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > struct drm_display_mode *cur_mode = NULL;
> > >
> > > if (!drm_enc) {
> > > @@ -1154,21 +1156,14 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_enable(struct
> > drm_encoder *drm_enc)
> > > trace_dpu_enc_enable(DRMID(drm_enc), cur_mode->hdisplay,
> > > cur_mode->vdisplay);
> > >
> > > - dpu_enc->cur_master = NULL;
> > > - for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) {
> > > - struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i];
> > > + /* always enable slave encoder before master */
> > > + phys = dpu_enc->cur_slave;
> >
> > I think this variable makes things less readable. It made sense in the
> > loop since
> > you're indented an extra level and they're obfuscated anyways, but since
> > they're
> > explicit now, could you please just use dpu_enc->cur_slave/master
> > directly?
> >
> > With this nit and the added changelog in the commit addressed,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > > + if (phys && phys->ops.enable)
> > > + phys->ops.enable(phys);
> > >
> > > - if (phys && phys->ops.is_master &&
> > phys->ops.is_master(phys)) {
> > > - DPU_DEBUG_ENC(dpu_enc, "master is now idx %d\n",
> > i);
> > > - dpu_enc->cur_master = phys;
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (!dpu_enc->cur_master) {
> > > - DPU_ERROR("virt encoder has no master! num_phys %d\n", i);
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> > > + phys = dpu_enc->cur_master;
> > > + if (phys && phys->ops.enable)
> > > + phys->ops.enable(phys);
> > >
> > > ret = dpu_encoder_resource_control(drm_enc,
> > DPU_ENC_RC_EVENT_KICKOFF);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > @@ -1177,21 +1172,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_enable(struct
> > drm_encoder *drm_enc)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) {
> > > - struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i];
> > > -
> > > - if (!phys)
> > > - continue;
> > > -
> > > - if (phys != dpu_enc->cur_master) {
> > > - if (phys->ops.enable)
> > > - phys->ops.enable(phys);
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (dpu_enc->cur_master->ops.enable)
> > > - dpu_enc->cur_master->ops.enable(dpu_enc->cur_master);
> > > -
> > > _dpu_encoder_virt_enable_helper(drm_enc);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2062,6 +2042,11 @@ static int dpu_encoder_virt_add_phys_encs(
> > > ++dpu_enc->num_phys_encs;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (params->split_role == ENC_ROLE_SLAVE)
> > > + dpu_enc->cur_slave = enc;
> > > + else
> > > + dpu_enc->cur_master = enc;
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2228,7 +2213,6 @@ int dpu_encoder_setup(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct drm_encoder *enc,
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto fail;
> > >
> > > - dpu_enc->cur_master = NULL;
> > > spin_lock_init(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock);
> > >
> > > atomic_set(&dpu_enc->frame_done_timeout, 0);
> > > --
> > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> > Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> > >
>
> --
> Jeykumar S
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
