On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:13 AM Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 10:48 AM Vivek Gautam
> <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Error paths in ufshcd_init() ufshcd_hba_exit() killed clk_scaling
> > workqueue when the workqueue is actually created quite late in
> > ufshcd_init().
> > So, we end up getting NULL pointer dereference in such error paths.
> > Fix this by moving clk_scaling initialization and kill codes to
> > two separate methods, and call them at required places.
> >
> > Fixes: 401f1e4490ee ("scsi: ufs: don't suspend clock scaling during clock
> > gating")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Bjorn, Subhash,
> > I am not certain of some of these devfreq, and clk_scaling bits
> > that are moved as part of this patch. Please help in reviewing the
> > change in the light of these features, and related sequence should
> > be followed.
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> You're right, there is a lot of logic moving around here. I think this
> looks okay to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Evan.
Best regards
Vivek
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
