On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:23:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Currently we check if the number of context banks is not equal to
> num_context_interrupts. However, there are booloaders such as, one
> on sdm845 that reserves few context banks and thus kernel views
> less than the total available context banks.
> So, although the hardware definition in device tree would mention
> the correct number of context interrupts, this number can be
> greater than the number of context banks visible to smmu in kernel.
> We should therefore error out only when the number of context banks
> is greater than the available number of context interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 7c69736a30f8..4cb53bf4f423 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -2229,12 +2229,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 &&
> - smmu->num_context_banks != smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> - dev_err(dev,
> - "found only %d context interrupt(s) but %d required\n",
> - smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2) {
> + if (smmu->num_context_banks > smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
> + smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> + /* loose extra context interrupts */
> + dev_notice(dev,
> + "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
> + smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> + smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
> + }
I don't see the utility in the new message. Can you simplify with the patch
below on top? It's a bit weird that we only decide to ignore the extra irqs
after calling platform_get_irq() on them, but that seems to be harmless.
Will
--->8
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index aa46c1ed5bf9..5349e22b5c78 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -2109,13 +2109,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
return -ENODEV;
- } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
- /* loose extra context interrupts */
- dev_notice(dev,
- "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
- smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
- smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
}
+
+ /* Ignore superfluous interrupts */
+ smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
}
for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_global_irqs; ++i) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
