Hi Mark, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 6:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some > Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs. These devices allow a given > processor within the SoC to make PMIC regulator requests which > are aggregated within the RPMh hardware block along with requests > from other processors in the SoC to determine the final PMIC > regulator hardware state. > > Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++ > .../dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h | 36 +++++ > 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+) I know you are still looking for time to review the RPMh-regulator driver and that's fine. One idea I had though: if the bindings look OK to you and are less controversial, is there any chance they could land in the meantime? Specifically it would be very handy to be able to post up device tree files that refer to regulators and even get those landed, but they can't land without the bindings. If that's not possible then no worries, but I figured I'd check. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
