On 7/12/2018 2:03 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:00:31PM +0530, Asutosh Das wrote:
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
UFS device and link can be put in multiple different low power modes hence
UFS driver supports multiple different low power modes. By default UFS
driver selects the default (optimal) low power mode (which gives moderate
power savings and have relatively less enter and exit latencies) but
we might have to tune this default power mode for different chipset
platforms to meet the low power requirements/goals. Hence this patch
adds option to change default UFS low power mode (level).
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt | 11 ++++++++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 14 +++++++++++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 4 +--
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
index c39dfef..f564d9a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
@@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ Optional properties:
defined or a value in the array is "0" then it is assumed
that the frequency is set by the parent clock or a
fixed rate clock source.
+- rpm-level : UFS Runtime power management level. Following PM levels are supported:
+ 0 - Both UFS device and Link in active state (Highest power consumption)
+ 1 - UFS device in active state but Link in Hibern8 state
+ 2 - UFS device in Sleep state but Link in active state
+ 3 - UFS device in Sleep state and Link in hibern8 state (default PM level)
+ 4 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in Hibern8 state
+ 5 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in OFF state (Lowest power consumption)
+- spm-level : UFS System power management level. Allowed PM levels are same as rpm-level.
What's the default?
I assume these are minimums? The OS can pick higher power states. This
seems to be a bit Linux specific (as 'runtime PM' could be considered
Linux specific). For every other device, we don't put this type of
information in DT, but is user controlled.
I didn't completely understand your comment.
Do you not want these properties to be in DT file?
When you say user-controlled, do you mean control it through sysfs entries?
So really, wouldn't 1
property be sufficient for cases where a mode doesn't work due to
some h/w limitation. Otherwise, it is an OS or user decision.
I didn't completely understand this. Could you please elaborate on your
intent here?
+
-lanes-per-direction : number of lanes available per direction - either 1 or 2.
Note that it is assume same number of lanes is used both
directions at once. If not specified, default is 2 lanes per direction.
@@ -66,4 +75,6 @@ Example:
freq-table-hz = <100000000 200000000>, <0 0>, <0 0>;
phys = <&ufsphy1>;
phy-names = "ufsphy";
+ rpm-level = <3>;
Why specified if 3 is the default?
Ah yes - that should be removed.
I'll remove it in v2.
+ spm-level = <5>;
These seem like sane defaults. When and why would you use some
different?
I think each of the deeper sleep modes are associated with an increasing
wakeup latency. For e.g. '0' would have the highest power-consumption
and no resume latency at all as compared to '5'.
So depending on use-cases other modes may be chosen.
Rob
-asd
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
