Hi Can,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Move MSM8996 specific PHY vreg list struct name to a genernal one as it is
> used by all PHYs. Add a specific field to handle dual lane situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index ccb8578..9be9754 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,8 @@ struct qmp_phy_cfg {
>
> /* true, if PHY has a separate DP_COM control block */
> bool has_phy_dp_com_ctrl;
> + /* true, if PHY has secondary tx/rx lanes to be configured */
> + bool is_dual_lane_phy;
> /* Register offset of secondary tx/rx lanes for USB DP combo PHY */
> unsigned int tx_b_lane_offset;
> unsigned int rx_b_lane_offset;
> @@ -758,7 +760,7 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> };
>
> /* list of regulators */
> -static const char * const msm8996_phy_vreg_l[] = {
> +static const char * const qmp_phy_vreg_l[] = {
> "vdda-phy", "vdda-pll",
> };
>
> @@ -778,8 +780,8 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_clk_l),
> .reset_list = msm8996_pciephy_reset_l,
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_pciephy_reset_l),
> - .vreg_list = msm8996_phy_vreg_l,
> - .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_vreg_l),
> + .vreg_list = qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> .regs = pciephy_regs_layout,
>
> .start_ctrl = PCS_START | PLL_READY_GATE_EN,
> @@ -809,8 +811,8 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_clk_l),
> .reset_list = msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l,
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l),
> - .vreg_list = msm8996_phy_vreg_l,
> - .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_vreg_l),
> + .vreg_list = qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> .regs = usb3phy_regs_layout,
>
> .start_ctrl = SERDES_START | PCS_START,
> @@ -870,8 +872,8 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_v3_phy_clk_l),
> .reset_list = msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l,
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l),
> - .vreg_list = msm8996_phy_vreg_l,
> - .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_vreg_l),
> + .vreg_list = qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> .regs = qmp_v3_usb3phy_regs_layout,
>
> .start_ctrl = SERDES_START | PCS_START,
> @@ -883,6 +885,7 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> .pwrdn_delay_max = POWER_DOWN_DELAY_US_MAX,
>
> .has_phy_dp_com_ctrl = true,
> + .is_dual_lane_phy = true,
> .tx_b_lane_offset = 0x400,
> .rx_b_lane_offset = 0x400,
> };
> @@ -903,8 +906,8 @@ static inline void qphy_clrbits(void __iomem *base, u32 offset, u32 val)
> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_v3_phy_clk_l),
> .reset_list = msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l,
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l),
> - .vreg_list = msm8996_phy_vreg_l,
> - .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_phy_vreg_l),
> + .vreg_list = qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> + .num_vregs = ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
> .regs = qmp_v3_usb3phy_regs_layout,
>
> .start_ctrl = SERDES_START | PCS_START,
> @@ -1116,12 +1119,12 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> /* Tx, Rx, and PCS configurations */
> qcom_qmp_phy_configure(tx, cfg->regs, cfg->tx_tbl, cfg->tx_tbl_num);
> /* Configuration for other LANE for USB-DP combo PHY */
> - if (cfg->has_phy_dp_com_ctrl)
> + if (cfg->is_dual_lane_phy)
> qcom_qmp_phy_configure(tx + cfg->tx_b_lane_offset, cfg->regs,
> cfg->tx_tbl, cfg->tx_tbl_num);
>
> qcom_qmp_phy_configure(rx, cfg->regs, cfg->rx_tbl, cfg->rx_tbl_num);
> - if (cfg->has_phy_dp_com_ctrl)
> + if (cfg->is_dual_lane_phy)
> qcom_qmp_phy_configure(rx + cfg->rx_b_lane_offset, cfg->regs,
> cfg->rx_tbl, cfg->rx_tbl_num);
>
Thanks for the patch. Looks good to me now.
Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards
Vivek
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
