On 6/21/18 11:24 PM, Vinod wrote:
On 21-06-18, 23:18, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 6/21/18 11:17 PM, Vinod wrote:
this should be a separate patch
What exactly should be a separate patch? This part?
- rng->hwrng.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
- rng->hwrng.init = msm_rng_init,
- rng->hwrng.cleanup = msm_rng_cleanup,
- rng->hwrng.read = msm_rng_read,
+ rng->hwrng.name = KBUILD_MODNAME;
+ rng->hwrng.init = msm_rng_init;
+ rng->hwrng.cleanup = msm_rng_cleanup;
+ rng->hwrng.read = msm_rng_read;
yes
II consider this to be a minor clean-up that's not worthy of its own
patch, but I can make this its own patch if you really want.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
