Re: [RFC PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Add quirk for msm8996 secured registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the review!

On 13/06/18 13:59, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 13/06/18 12:43, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Access to GICR_WAKER is restricted on msm8996 SoC. Its been more

Restricted by what? Firmware? Hypervisor? (most likely the later).

Yes, its the Hypervisor (TZ firmware)

than 2 years of wait for this to be fixed in firmware which is

This surely bodes very well in this day and age, where firmware update
are becoming just as important as updating your kernel and your
userspace to fix security problems. I'm impressed.

not going anywhere. So add a quirk to not write to this register.
With this quirk MSM8996 can atleast boot out of mainline,

at least
yep.


which can help community to work with boards based on MSM8996.

Without this patch Qualcomm DB820c board reboots when GICR_WAKER
is written to.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 76ea56d779a1..d1bb2c0cce02 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct redist_region {
  	bool			single_redist;
  };
+#define GICV3_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_IW_GICR_WAKER (1ULL << 0)

Drop the GICV3 prefix. What does IW means here? Please provide an
I will drop the prefix.

erratum number for this, and add a description to
Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt.

Am not sure there is any silicon level errata associated with this, as its related to firmware. Any way I will try to dig up the docs to see if there is any.


+
  struct gic_chip_data {
  	struct fwnode_handle	*fwnode;
  	void __iomem		*dist_base;
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
  	struct irq_domain	*domain;
  	u64			redist_stride;
  	u32			nr_redist_regions;
+	u64			flags;
  	bool			has_rss;
  	unsigned int		irq_nr;
  	struct partition_desc	*ppi_descs[16];
@@ -139,6 +142,9 @@ static void gic_enable_redist(bool enable)
  	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
  	u32 val;
+ if (gic_data.flags & GICV3_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_IW_GICR_WAKER)
+		return;
+
  	rbase = gic_data_rdist_rd_base();
val = readl_relaxed(rbase + GICR_WAKER);
@@ -1064,6 +1070,31 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops partition_domain_ops = {
  	.select = gic_irq_domain_select,
  };
+static bool __maybe_unused gicv3_enable_quirk_msm8996(void *data)

All the functions are prefixed with gic, not gicv3. The function name
should reflect the erratum number.
will fix it in next version.


+{
+	struct gic_chip_data *d = data;
+
+	d->flags |= GICV3_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_IW_GICR_WAKER;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static const struct gic_quirk gicv3_quirks[] = {
+	{
+		.desc	= "GICV3: Qualcomm MSM8996 WAKER IW",

Please the erratum number in the message. It should read something like:

		"GICv3: Qualcomm erratum BIGNUMBERHERE"

+		.iidr	= 0x00001070,	/* MSM8996 */
+		.mask	= 0x0000ffff,

Please match the full GICD_IIDR register, not just the implementer and
the revision. Unless you expect all the QC systems to have the same
behaviour?
There seems to be more than one SoC that has this issue, I will dig up more info before sending next version.


+		.init	= gicv3_enable_quirk_msm8996,
+	},
+};
+
+static void gic_v3_enable_quirks(struct gic_chip_data *gic_data)

gic, not gic_v3.
yep.

Thanks,
srini


+{
+	u32 iidr = readl_relaxed(gic_data->dist_base + GICD_IIDR);
+
+	gic_enable_quirks(iidr, gicv3_quirks, gic_data);
+}
+
  static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
  				 struct redist_region *rdist_regs,
  				 u32 nr_redist_regions,
@@ -1126,6 +1157,7 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis())
  		its_init(handle, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain);
+ gic_v3_enable_quirks(&gic_data);
  	gic_smp_init();
  	gic_dist_init();
  	gic_cpu_init();


Thanks,

	M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux