On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> SDM845 uses the TSENS v2 IP block
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c | 9 ++++++++-
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 +++
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 5 ++++-
> 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> index 06195e8..84da3db 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties:
> - "qcom,msm8916-tsens" : For 8916 Family of SoCs
> - "qcom,msm8974-tsens" : For 8974 Family of SoCs
> - "qcom,msm8996-tsens" : For 8996 Family of SoCs
> + - "qcom,tsens-v2" : For any SoC with v2 version of the tsens IP
Stick with "qcom,sdm845-tsens". Though perhaps it should be
'"qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,msm8996-tsens"' if there is compatibility.
>
> - reg: Address range of the thermal registers
> - #thermal-sensor-cells : Should be 1. See ./thermal.txt for a description.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> index 6c8a857..28d4c08 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@
> };
>
> tsens0: thermal-sensor@4a8000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,msm8996-tsens";
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8996-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
There's no point to adding this now because you already have to
support "qcom,msm8996-tsens".
> reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
> <0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
> #qcom,sensors = <13>;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> index c981a40..abc8f13 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v2.c
> @@ -69,8 +69,15 @@ static const struct tsens_ops ops_v2 = {
> .get_temp = get_temp_tsens_v2,
> };
>
> +const struct tsens_data data_tsens_v2 = {
> + .ops = &ops_v2,
> +};
> +
> +/* Kept around for backward compatibility with old msm8996.dtsi.
> + * New platforms should use data_tsens_v2 if possible and define
> + * the #qcom,sensors property in DT.
Hum, I think this should just be implied by the compatible as it was.
If this was the *only* difference, then a property would be okay, but
as soon as you find some other difference you need yet another
property and have to do a DT update on all platforms.
> + */
> const struct tsens_data data_8996 = {
> .num_sensors = 13,
> .ops = &ops_v2,
> };
> -
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> index 3440166c..a2c9bfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-tsens",
> .data = &data_8996,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "qcom,tsens-v2",
> + .data = &data_tsens_v2,
Why different data if 8996 is compatible with v2?
> },
> {}
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> index dc56e1e..69212cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ void compute_intercept_slope(struct tsens_device *, u32 *, u32 *, u32);
> int init_common(struct tsens_device *);
> int get_temp_common(struct tsens_device *, int, int *);
>
> -extern const struct tsens_data data_8916, data_8974, data_8960, data_8996;
> +/* TSENS v1 targets */
> +extern const struct tsens_data data_8916, data_8974, data_8960;
> +/* TSENS v2 targets */
> +extern const struct tsens_data data_8996, data_tsens_v2;
>
> #endif /* __QCOM_TSENS_H__ */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
