Hi,
On 5/31/2018 3:19 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Raju P L S S S N
<rplsssn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@
#define CMD_STATUS_ISSUED BIT(8)
#define CMD_STATUS_COMPL BIT(16)
+LIST_HEAD(rsc_drv_list);
I still see no point of rsc_drv_list. Please remove it, AKA squash in
<http://crosreview.com/1042883>.
Agree.
I'm also still of the opinion that we should take something like
<http://crosreview.com/1054646>, AKA "Get rid of the global array
rpmh_rsc".
+/**
+ * __rpmh_write: send the RPMH request
+ *
+ * @dev: The device making the request
+ * @state: Active/Sleep request type
+ * @rpm_msg: The data that needs to be sent (cmds).
+ */
+static int __rpmh_write(const struct device *dev, enum rpmh_state state,
+ struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg)
+{
+ struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr = get_rpmh_ctrlr(dev);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(ctrlr))
+ return PTR_ERR(ctrlr);
+
+ rpm_msg->msg.state = state;
+
+ if (state != RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+
+ return rpmh_rsc_send_data(ctrlr->drv, &rpm_msg->msg);
+}
You went too far in the removal of EXPORT_SYMBOL I think. This symbol
needs to be exported because other code that could be compiled as a
module might need to call into it. To explain:
* If two files that are always built-in to Linux need to call into
each other: no need for EXPORT_SYMBOL.
* If two files that are always part of the same module need to call
into each other: no need for EXPORT_SYMBOL.
* If one file that might be built-into a module needs to call another
that's builtin to the kernel: need EXPORT_SYMBOL.
Thanks for the explanation Doug. Will address this.
Thanks,
Raju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
