On 5/30/2018 10:56 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > This *was* my idea, but I'm starting to think it was a bad idea. > > I don't want people to use pci= parameters as the normal way to get a > system to boot. That would be a huge support hassle (putting things > in release notes, diagnosing problems when people forget it, etc). > > But the parameters *are* useful for debugging. If we had a > "pci=safemode" and it avoided some problem, the next step would be to > narrow it down by using the more specific flags (pci=nomsi, pci=noari, > pci=no_ext_tags, etc). So I think 95% of the value is in the specific > flags, and a "pci=safemode" might add a little bit of value but at the > cost of a small but nagging maintenance concern and code clutter. OK. Let's try noXYZ feature. Can you enumerate the XYZ features that you want to see? -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
