Hi, On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:23:20PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> > + qcom,drms-mode-max-microamps = <10000 1000000>; > >> Things look pretty good to me now. I'm still hesitant about the whole >> need to list the modes twice (once using the unordered >> "regulator-allowed-modes" and once to match up against the ordered >> "qcom,drms-mode-max-microamps"). I'm also still of the opinion that >> the whole "drms-mode-max-microamps" ought to be a standard property >> (not a qcom specific one) and handled in the regulator core. > > I'm confused as to why we are specifying the maximum current the device > can deliver in a given mode in the DT - surely that's a fixed property > of the hardware? Said another way: you're saying that you'd expect the "max-microamps" table to have one fewer element than the listed modes? So in the above example you'd have: drms-modes: LPM, HPM max-microamps: 10000 ...or in a more complicated case, you could have: drms-modes: RET, LPM, AUTO, HPM max-microamps: 1, 100, 10000 Did I understand you correctly? I'm personally OK with that color for the shed. I kinda like the symmetry of having the same number of elements in both lists (and being able to print an error message if someone ends up asking for too much current), but it's not a big deal for me either way. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
