Hi Robin, On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:12 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22/03/18 10:22, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> This series provides the support for turning on the arm-smmu's >> clocks/power domains using runtime pm. This is done using the >> recently introduced device links patches, which lets the smmu's >> runtime to follow the master's runtime pm, so the smmu remains >> powered only when the masters use it. >> As not all implementations support clock/power gating, we are checking >> for a valid 'smmu->dev's pm_domain' to conditionally enable the runtime >> power management for such smmu implementations that can support it. >> >> This series also adds support for Qcom's arm-smmu-v2 variant that >> has different clocks and power requirements. >> >> Took some reference from the exynos runtime patches [1]. >> >> With conditional runtime pm now, we avoid touching dev->power.lock >> in fastpaths for smmu implementations that don't need to do anything >> useful with pm_runtime. >> This lets us to use the much-argued pm_runtime_get_sync/put_sync() >> calls in map/unmap callbacks so that the clients do not have to >> worry about handling any of the arm-smmu's power. >> >> Previous version of this patch series is @ [5]. >> >> [v11] >> * Some more cleanups for device link. We don't need an explicit >> delete for device link from the driver, but just set the flag >> DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE. >> device_link_add() API description says - >> "If the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE is set, the link will be removed >> automatically when the consumer device driver unbinds." > > > But then if the consumer subsequently rebinds, there's no opportunity to > recreate the link, and PM will just quietly stop functioning properly. Given > that it's a lot more reasonable for users to unload and reload modules (or > otherwise switch drivers) for a consumer device than it is to unbind the > SMMU driver or expect actual device hotplug, I'd rather do nothing and > theoretically leak links than autoremove them incorrectly. > > AFAICS the previous discussion on this got as far as Lukas' suggestion of > adding an equivalent flag for supplier-managed links (which FWIW sounds good > to me), but seems to have stalled there. Thanks for the review. I have posted a small change [1] for this. Kindly take a look. Best regards Vivek [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10438109/ > > Robin. > > >> * Addressed the comments for 'smmu' in arm_smmu_map/unmap(). >> * Dropped the patch [10] that introduced device_link_del_dev() API. >> >> [v10] >> * Introduce device_link_del_dev() API to delete the link between >> given consumer and supplier devices. The users of device link >> do not need to store link pointer to delete the link later. >> They can straightaway use this API by passing consumer and >> supplier devices. >> * Made corresponding changes to arm-smmu driver patch handling the >> device links. >> * Dropped the patch [9] that was adding device_link_find() API to >> device core layer. device_link_del_dev() serves the purpose to >> directly delete the link between two given devices. >> >> [v9] >> * Removed 'rpm_supported' flag, instead checking on pm_domain >> to enable runtime pm. >> * Creating device link only when the runtime pm is enabled, as we >> don't need a device link besides managing the power dependency >> between supplier and consumer devices. >> * Introducing a patch to add device_link_find() API that finds >> and existing link between supplier and consumer devices. >> Also, made necessary change to device_link_add() to use this API. >> * arm_smmu_remove_device() now uses this device_link_find() to find >> the device link between smmu device and the master device, and then >> delete this link. >> * Dropped the destroy_domain_context() fix [8] as it was rather, >> introducing catastrophically bad problem by destroying >> 'good dev's domain context. >> * Added 'Reviwed-by' tag for Tomasz's review. >> >> [v8] >> * Major change - >> - Added a flag 'rpm_supported' which each platform that supports >> runtime pm, can enable, and we enable runtime_pm over arm-smmu >> only when this flag is set. >> - Adding the conditional pm_runtime_get/put() calls to .map, .unmap >> and .attach_dev ops. >> - Dropped the patch [6] that exported pm_runtim_get/put_suupliers(), >> and also dropped the user driver patch [7] for these APIs. >> >> * Clock code further cleanup >> - doing only clk_bulk_enable() and clk_bulk_disable() in runtime pm >> callbacks. We shouldn't be taking a slow path >> (clk_prepare/unprepare()) >> from these runtime pm callbacks. Thereby, moved clk_bulk_prepare() >> to >> arm_smmu_device_probe(), and clk_bulk_unprepare() to >> arm_smmu_device_remove(). >> - clk data filling to a common method arm_smmu_fill_clk_data() that >> fills the clock ids and number of clocks. >> >> * Addressed other nits and comments >> - device_link_add() error path fixed. >> - Fix for checking negative error value from pm_runtime_get_sync(). >> - Documentation redo. >> >> * Added another patch fixing the error path in arm_smmu_attach_dev() >> to destroy allocated domain context. >> >> [v7] >> * Addressed review comments given by Robin Murphy - >> - Added device_link_del() in .remove_device path. >> - Error path cleanup in arm_smmu_add_device(). >> - Added pm_runtime_get/put_sync() in .remove path, and replaced >> pm_runtime_force_suspend() with pm_runtime_disable(). >> - clk_names cleanup in arm_smmu_init_clks() >> * Added 'Reviewed-by' given by Rob H. >> >> [V6] >> * Added Ack given by Rafael to first patch in the series. >> * Addressed Rob Herring's comment for adding soc specific compatible >> string as well besides 'qcom,smmu-v2'. >> >> [V5] >> * Dropped runtime pm calls from "arm_smmu_unmap" op as discussed over >> the list [3] for the last patch series. >> * Added a patch to export pm_runtime_get/put_suppliers() APIs to the >> series as agreed with Rafael [4]. >> * Added the related patch for msm drm iommu layer to use >> pm_runtime_get/put_suppliers() APIs in msm_mmu_funcs. >> * Dropped arm-mmu500 clock patch since that would break existing >> platforms. >> * Changed compatible 'qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2' to 'qcom,smmu-v2' to >> reflect >> the IP version rather than the platform on which it is used. >> The same IP is used across multiple platforms including msm8996, >> and sdm845 etc. >> * Using clock bulk APIs to handle the clocks available to the IP as >> suggested by Stephen Boyd. >> * The first patch in v4 version of the patch-series: >> ("iommu/arm-smmu: Fix the error path in arm_smmu_add_device") has >> already made it to mainline. >> >> [V4] >> * Reworked the clock handling part. We now take clock names as data >> in the driver for supported compatible versions, and loop over them >> to get, enable, and disable the clocks. >> * Using qcom,msm8996 based compatibles for bindings instead of a >> generic >> qcom compatible. >> * Refactor MMU500 patch to just add the necessary clock names data and >> corresponding bindings. >> * Added the pm_runtime_get/put() calls in .unmap iommu op (fix added >> by >> Stanimir on top of previous patch version. >> * Added a patch to fix error path in arm_smmu_add_device() >> * Removed patch 3/5 of V3 patch series that added qcom,smmu-v2 >> bindings. >> >> [V3] >> * Reworked the patches to keep the clocks init/enabling function >> separately for each compatible. >> >> * Added clocks bindings for MMU40x/500. >> >> * Added a new compatible for qcom,smmu-v2 implementation and >> the clock bindings for the same. >> >> * Rebased on top of 4.11-rc1 >> >> [V2] >> * Split the patches little differently. >> >> * Addressed comments. >> >> * Removed the patch #4 [2] from previous post >> for arm-smmu context save restore. Planning to >> post this separately after reworking/addressing Robin's >> feedback. >> >> * Reversed the sequence to disable clocks than enabling. >> This was required for those cases where the >> clocks are populated in a dependent order from DT. >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/20/70 >> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9389717/ >> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10204925/ >> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10102445/ >> [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/14/127 >> [6] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10204945/ >> [7] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10204925/ >> [8] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10254105/ >> [9] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10277975/ >> [10] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10281613/ >> >> Sricharan R (3): >> iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops >> iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device >> iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu >> >> Vivek Gautam (1): >> iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 42 +++++ >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 178 >> +++++++++++++++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
