Hi, On 5/12/2018 1:45 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi, On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:+int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request *msg) +{ + int ret; + + if (!msg || !msg->cmds || !msg->num_cmds || + msg->num_cmds > MAX_RPMH_PAYLOAD) { + WARN_ON(1); + return -EINVAL; + } + + do { + ret = tcs_write(drv, msg); + if (ret == -EBUSY) { + pr_info_ratelimited("TCS Busy, retrying RPMH message send: addr=%#x\n", + msg->cmds[0].addr); + udelay(10); + } + } while (ret == -EBUSY); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_rsc_send_data);Here and elsewhere in this series: why EXPORT_SYMBOL in this case? This is only exported to rpmh.c, right? You don't need EXPORT_SYMBOL for that. The Makefile puts rpmh.c and rpmh-rsc.c together in the same "qcom_rpmh.o", and then even further the KConfig lists this as bool so both are builtin to the kernel. -Doug
Sure. I Will change in v9. Thanks for your review Doug, Raju
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
