Re: [PATCH] alpha: io: reorder barriers to guarantee writeX() and iowriteX() ordering #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 4/17/2018 2:43 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 4/16/2018 6:16 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> memory-barriers.txt has been updated with the following requirement.
>>>
>>> "When using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the
>>> cache coherent memory writes have completed before writing to the MMIO
>>> region."
>>>
>>> Current writeX() and iowriteX() implementations on alpha are not
>>> satisfying this requirement as the barrier is after the register write.
>>>
>>> Move mb() in writeX() and iowriteX() functions to guarantee that HW
>>> observes memory changes before performing register operations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/alpha/kernel/io.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> Sorry for catching this late but this also needs to go to 4.17 after
>> review.
>>
>> I missed the writel() implementation on arch/alpha/kernel/io.c file
>> on my first patch.
>>
>
> Can you also queue this for 4.17?
>
> There are already drivers checked into 4.17 that dropped the unnecessary
> barriers.
>
> I really hate to see Alpha broken because of this.

Yes, I will pick it up for 4.17.

Thanks for the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux