Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2018, 20:18 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar: > On 2018-04-19 14:15, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2018, 12:44 +0530 schrieb Tushar Nimkar: > > > On 2018-04-17 12:03, Tushar Nimkar wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > I have doubt that sequential scan(scsi_sequential_lun_scan) work well > > > for uas device(SCSI>3).. > > > Why? As I have seen in most cases failed to enumerate during > > > REPORT_LUN > > > command...and there is older way to scan disk is also present, > > > so I was thinking to try that.. did following things > > > > > > starget->no_report_luns = 1 ---> for my target while uas_target_alloc > > > (for try) > > > > In general the spec is one thing and reality is another thing. > > You can depend really only on what recent versions of Windows do. > > did not get you! Devices often implement the spec only to the extent they need to in order to work with Windows. > oh, so no backward old way of scanning(sequential)? No. But for testing we don't need to. Can you confirm that the problem is triggered by specific commands? Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
