Hi Abhishek,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 12:24:16 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
<absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2018-04-10 14:42, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Abhishek,
> > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:12:20 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
> > <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> parse_read_errors can be called with only oob buf also in which
> >> case data_buf will be NULL. If data_buf is NULL, then don’t
> >> treat this page as completely erased in case of ECC uncorrectable
> >> error.
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 7 +++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> index 57c16a6..0ebcc55 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> >> @@ -1607,9 +1607,11 @@ static int parse_read_errors(struct >> qcom_nand_host *host, u8 *data_buf,
> >> if (host->bch_enabled) {
> >> erased = (erased_cw & ERASED_CW) == ERASED_CW ?
> >> true : false;
> > > Why the parse_read_errors() function could not be called without
> > data_buf when using BCH? Are you sure the situation can only happen
> > without it?
> >
> host->bch_enabled case is different where controller itself tells
> regarding erased page in status register.
>
> > Would the following apply here too, with a:
> >
> erased_chunk_check_and_fixup will be used only for 4 bit RS ECC
> code in which there is no support from HW for erased page detection
> and we need to check few data bytes value.
So please explain this with a comment.
Thanks,
Miquèl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
