On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Knowing the sleep duration of CPUs, is known to be needed while selecting
> the most energy efficient idle state for a CPU or a group of CPUs.
>
> However, to be able to compute the sleep duration, we need to know at what
> time the next expected wakeup is for the CPU. Therefore, let's export this
> information via a new function, tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(). Following
> changes make use of it.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/tick.h | 10 ++++++++++
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 389aa25..d341811 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ extern bool tick_nohz_idle_got_tick(void);
> extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(ktime_t *delta_next);
> extern unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void);
> extern unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls_cpu(int cpu);
> +extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu);
> extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
> extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
>
> @@ -151,6 +152,15 @@ static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(ktime_t *delta_next)
> *delta_next = TICK_NSEC;
> return *delta_next;
> }
> +
> +static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu)
> +{
> + ktime_t t;
> +
> + /* Next wake up is the tick period, assume it starts now */
> + return ktime_add(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(&t), ktime_get());
> +}
Well, given that tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() is just the above in
this case, wouldn't it be simpler to return ktime_add(ktime_get(),
TICK_NSEC) from here?
> +
> static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
> static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 646645e..08db7f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,17 @@ unsigned long tick_nohz_get_idle_calls(void)
> return ts->idle_calls;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup - return the next wake up of the CPU
> + */
> +ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct clock_event_device *dev =
> + per_cpu(tick_cpu_device.evtdev, cpu);
I would avoid breaking the line, honestly.
If you really really want to avoid going above the 80 chars line
length limit, why don't you do
struct clock_event_device *dev;
dev = per_cpu(tick_cpu_device.evtdev, cpu);
> +
> + return dev->next_event;
> +}
> +
> static void tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(struct tick_sched *ts)
> {
> #ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
