Query:Regarding percpu_counter debug object destroy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi ,

I have checked below code and it seems we are calling debug_object_free twice, ideally we should deactivate and later we
have to destroy.

1st call -> percpu_counter_destroy->debug_percpu_counter_deactivate -> debug_object_free
2nd call ->
debug_object_free



static bool percpu_counter_fixup_free(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
{
        struct percpu_counter *fbc = addr;

        switch (state) {
        case ODEBUG_STATE_ACTIVE:
                percpu_counter_destroy(fbc);  -> first call
                debug_object_free(fbc, &percpu_counter_debug_descr); 2nd call
                return true;
        default:
                return false;
        }
}


We are seeing one issue, where one list contain garbage data in obj_hash, just before element of that is percpu_counter but
still not sure as it is very difficult to reproduce.

Can some one please review above code or can we remove one instance of debug_object_free from above code.

Regards
Gaurav

--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux