Hi Tomasz, On 2018/4/10 21:14, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Yisheng, > > Sorry, I think we missed your question here. > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:12 PM Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Vivek, > >> On 2018/3/28 12:37, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> Hi Yisheng >>> >>> >>> On 3/28/2018 6:54 AM, Yisheng Xie wrote: >>>> Hi Vivek, >>>> >>>> On 2018/3/13 16:55, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>>>> +- power-domains: Specifiers for power domains required to be > powered on for >>>>> + the SMMU to operate, as per generic power domain > bindings. >>>>> + >>>> In this patchset, power-domains is not used right? And you just do the > clock gating, >>>> but not power gating, right? >>> >>> We are handling the power-domains too. Please see the example in this > binding doc. > >> I see, but I do not find the point in code of these patchset, do you mean > PMIC(e.g mmcc) >> will gate the power domain of SMMU(e.g. MDSS_GDSC of mmcc) when PMIC > suspend? > > > If respective SoC power domains is registered as a standard genpd PM > domain, then the runtime PM subsystem will take care of power domain > control at runtime suspend and resume. > Get it, thanks for your explain, I should have learned about this. Thanks Yisheng > Best regards, > Tomasz > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
