On Sun 08 Apr 03:32 PDT 2018, Taniya Das wrote: > From: Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add RPMh clock device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's SoCs. These > devices would be used for communicating resource state requests to control > the clocks managed by RPMh. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4ade82b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Clocks > +------------------------------------------------------- > + > +Resource Power Manager Hardened (RPMh) manages shared resources on > +some Qualcomm Technologies Inc. SoCs. It accepts clock requests from > +other hardware subsystems via RSC to control clocks. > + > +Required properties : > +- compatible : shall contain "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845" We have a chance to fix this to Rob's liking, so please make this "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clock" (or maybe "qcom,sdm845-rpmhcc"?) > + > +- #clock-cells : must contain 1 > + > +Example : > + > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h> > + > + &apps_rsc { > + rpmh: clock-controller { I believe the clock-controller, the power-domain and the bus-scaler are equal contenders of the label "rpmh", so please make it more specific. How about "rpmhcc" to mimic previous platforms? > + compatible = "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845"; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + }; > + }; Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html