On Sun 08 Apr 03:32 PDT 2018, Taniya Das wrote:
> From: Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add RPMh clock device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's SoCs. These
> devices would be used for communicating resource state requests to control
> the clocks managed by RPMh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4ade82b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. RPMh Clocks
> +-------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +Resource Power Manager Hardened (RPMh) manages shared resources on
> +some Qualcomm Technologies Inc. SoCs. It accepts clock requests from
> +other hardware subsystems via RSC to control clocks.
> +
> +Required properties :
> +- compatible : shall contain "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845"
We have a chance to fix this to Rob's liking, so please make this
"qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clock" (or maybe "qcom,sdm845-rpmhcc"?)
> +
> +- #clock-cells : must contain 1
> +
> +Example :
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> +
> + &apps_rsc {
> + rpmh: clock-controller {
I believe the clock-controller, the power-domain and the bus-scaler are
equal contenders of the label "rpmh", so please make it more specific.
How about "rpmhcc" to mimic previous platforms?
> + compatible = "qcom,rpmh-clk-sdm845";
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
