Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: qcom: Clear hardware clock control bit of RCG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/20/2018 4:25 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-03-07 23:18:12)
For upcoming targets like sdm845, POR value of the hardware clock control
bit is set for most of root clocks which needs to be cleared for software
to be able to control. For older targets like MSM8996, this bit is reserved
bit and having POR value as 0 so this patch will work for the older targets
too. So update the configuration mask to take care of the same to clear
hardware clock control bit.

Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c | 5 +++--
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
index bbeaf9c..e63db10 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
  /*
- * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2013, 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
It would be nice if lawyers over there could avoid forcing copyright
date updates when less than half the file changes.

Thanks for the review.
I will address the above in the next patch series.


   *
   * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
   * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
  #define CFG_MODE_SHIFT         12
  #define CFG_MODE_MASK          (0x3 << CFG_MODE_SHIFT)
  #define CFG_MODE_DUAL_EDGE     (0x2 << CFG_MODE_SHIFT)
+#define CFG_HW_CLK_CTRL_MASK   BIT(20)

  #define M_REG                  0x8
  #define N_REG                  0xc
@@ -276,7 +277,7 @@ static int clk_rcg2_configure(struct clk_rcg2 *rcg, const struct freq_tbl *f)
         }

         mask = BIT(rcg->hid_width) - 1;
-       mask |= CFG_SRC_SEL_MASK | CFG_MODE_MASK;
+       mask |= CFG_SRC_SEL_MASK | CFG_MODE_MASK | CFG_HW_CLK_CTRL_MASK;
         cfg = f->pre_div << CFG_SRC_DIV_SHIFT;
         cfg |= rcg->parent_map[index].cfg << CFG_SRC_SEL_SHIFT;
         if (rcg->mnd_width && f->n && (f->m != f->n))
Is there going to be a future patch to update the RCGs to indicate they
support hardware control or not?

As of now, there will not be any patch to update the RCGs to support HW control.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux