On 3/22/2018 9:40 AM, Steve Wise wrote: > I think all these iw_cxgb4 changes should be reverted until we really have a > plan for multi-platform that works. I know you are looking to have support for PowerPC. Isn't this a PowerPC problem? Why penalize other architectures? Do you see anything wrong with the code itself? I started this thread with the PowerPC develoeprs on your request. "RFC on writel and writel_relaxed" They are looking into adding the relaxed API support. Support can come in later. Why block this change now? benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "I've been wanting to implement the relaxed accessors for a while but was battling with this to try to also better support WC, and due to other commitments, this somewhat fell down the cracks." I have seen four different responses on this thread. Since this is an architecture change it will take a while to get the semantics right. It won't happen in the new few days. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
