> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma_mgmt.c > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int __init hidma_mgmt_of_populate_channels(struct device_node *np) > } > of_node_get(child); > new_pdev->dev.of_node = child; > - of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child); > + of_dma_configure(&new_pdev->dev, child, true); > /* > * It is assumed that calling of_msi_configure is safe on > * platforms with or without MSI support. Where did we mark this bus as force_dma before? > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > index 9a4f4246..895c83e 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(struct device *dev, > /* ensure that dma_ops is set for virtual devices > * using reserved memory > */ > - of_dma_configure(dev, np); > + of_dma_configure(dev, np, true); Did all the callers of this one really force dma? I have a hard time untangling the call stacks unfortunately. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
