On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
wmb().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h | 5 -----
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
confidence if the code does not even compile.
Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.
I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.
I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.
I will rebase to Jeff's tree.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
