Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2018-03-21 11:07:09)
> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:58 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +static int msm_pinmux_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned
> > offset)
> > +{
> > + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> > + struct gpio_chip *chip = &pctrl->chip;
> > +
> > + if (gpiochip_line_is_valid(chip, offset))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Perhaps traditional pattern
>
> if (!...)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return 0;
>
Or ternary?
return gpiochip_line_is_valid(chip, offset) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>
> > +}
>
> > seq_printf(s, " %dmA", msm_regval_to_drive(drive));
> > - seq_printf(s, " %s", pulls[pull]);
> > + seq_printf(s, " %s\n", pulls[pull]);
>
> I had commented this once, but you ignored by some reason.
>
> I would rather just move
> seq_puts(s, "\n");
> here.
>
> The rationale behind, besides making diff more neat, is to reduce
> possible burden in the future if someone would like to squeeze more data
> in between.
Sure.
>
> > + tmp = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(tmp[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> sizeof(*tmp) ?
>
Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
