On 03/18/2018 01:38 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c:1104:3-8:
> No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Thanks for pointing this out.
> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpmh-regulator.c
> @@ -1101,7 +1101,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rpmh_regul
> .driver = {
> .name = "qcom-rpmh-regulator",
> .of_match_table = rpmh_regulator_match_table,
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> },
> .probe = rpmh_regulator_probe,
> .remove = rpmh_regulator_remove,
I'll make this modification in [1] if I end up sending out a second
version of the patch.
Take care,
David
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/1430
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
