Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> + gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";
> + reg = <0x100000 0x1f0000>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + };
Seems like we need "#power-domain-cells = <1>;" in the gcc node.
It is true that the property is listed as "optional" in the bindings,
but we certainly know that the
"include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h" that's posted [1]
contains several defines ending in "_GDSC" and once we start
referencing those we'll need "#power-domain-cells". Seems like we
should just have it from the beginning.
NOTE: IMHO adding "#power-domain-cells" could be done as a follow-on
patch, but since (I think) this series still hasn't landed I guess we
could just send up v6?
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267093/
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
