Re: [PATCH] mm: oom: Fix race condition between oom_badness and do_exit of task

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/8/2018 2:26 AM, David Rientjes wrote:

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Gaurav Kohli wrote:

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 6fd9773..5f4cc4b 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
for_each_thread(p, t) {
  		task_lock(t);
+		get_task_struct(t);
  		if (likely(t->mm))
  			goto found;
  		task_unlock(t);
+		put_task_struct(t);
  	}
  	t = NULL;
  found:
We hold rcu_read_lock() here, so perhaps only do get_task_struct() before
doing rcu_read_unlock() and we have a non-NULL t?

Here rcu_read_lock will not help, as our task may change due to below algo:

for_each_thread(p, t) {
 		task_lock(t);
+		get_task_struct(t);
 		if (likely(t->mm))
 			goto found;
 		task_unlock(t);
+		put_task_struct(t)


So only we can increase usage counter here only at the current task.

I have seen you new patch, that seems valid to me and it will resolve our issue.
Thanks for support.

Regards

Gaurav


--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux