2018-02-08 15:09 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Benjamin Gaignard > <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> dma_alloc_coherent expects it third argument type to be dma_addr_t and >> not phys_addr_t. >> When phys_addr_t is defined as u32 and dma_addr_t as u64 that generate >> a compilation issue. >> Change the variable name because dma_alloc_coherent returns a bus >> address not a physical address. >> > >> @@ -480,14 +480,14 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz, >> >> /* Fill details of mem buff to map */ >> mem_to_map = ptr + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); >> - mem_to_map_phys = ptr_phys + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); >> + mem_to_map_phys = handle + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); >> mem_to_map[0].mem_addr = cpu_to_le64(mem_addr); >> mem_to_map[0].mem_size = cpu_to_le64(mem_sz); >> >> next_vm = 0; >> /* Fill details of next vmid detail */ >> destvm = ptr + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); >> - dest_phys = ptr_phys + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); >> + dest_phys = handle + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64); > > This still assigns from a 'dma' address to a 'phys' address without a > long comment > explaining why you do it. There is also another instance of the naming confusion > in qcom_scm_pas_init_image and __qcom_scm_pas_init_image, so maybe they > should be addressed at the same time. This patch just fix a compilation issue, nothing else. > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
