Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] drivers: irqchip: pdc: Add PDC interrupt controller for QCOM SoCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 07 2018 at 16:43 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 07/02/18 15:49, Lina Iyer wrote:
From : Archana Sathyakumar <asathyak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The Power Domain Controller (PDC) on QTI SoCs like SDM845 houses an
interrupt controller along with other domain control functions to handle
interrupt related functions like handle falling edge or active low which
are not detected at the GIC and handle wakeup interrupts.

The interrupt controller is on an always-on domain for the purpose of
waking up the processor. Only a subset of the processor's interrupts are
routed through the PDC to the GIC. The PDC powers on the processors'
domain, when in low power mode and replays pending interrupts so the GIC
may wake up the processor.

Signed-off-by: Archana Sathyakumar <asathyak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

+	parent_hwirq = get_parent_hwirq(hwirq);

Now that you return a well known value on error, how about testing it
and erroring out instead of propagating it to the parent?

Hmm.. Okay.

+	region = kcalloc(n, sizeof(*region), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!region)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "qcom,pdc-ranges", region, n);
+	if (ret)
+		goto fail;
+
+	pdc_region_cnt = n / 3;
+	pdc_region = kcalloc(pdc_region_cnt, sizeof(*pdc_region), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pdc_region) {
+		pdc_region_cnt = 0;
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	for (n = 0; n < pdc_region_cnt; n++, region += 3) {
+		pdc_region[n].pin_base    = region[0];
+		pdc_region[n].parent_base = region[1];
+		pdc_region[n].cnt         = region[2];

Here's an alternative version that doesn't require any bounce buffer:

	for (n = 0; n < pdc_region_cnt; n++) {
		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "qcom,pdc-ranges",
				 n * 3 + 0, &pdc_region[n].pin_base);
		if (ret)
			goto fail;
		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "qcom,pdc-ranges",
				 n * 3 + 1, &pdc_region[n].parent_base);
		if (ret)
			goto fail;
		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "qcom,pdc-ranges",
				 n * 3 + 2, &pdc_region[n].cnt);
		if (ret)
			goto fail;
	}

And you can get rid of "region" altogether, because...

+	}
+
+fail:
+	kfree(region);

... now that once you've incremented "region" in your for() loop, this
kfree isn't going to do what you think it does.

Sure.

+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_pdc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	struct irq_domain *parent_domain, *pdc_domain;
+	int ret;
+
+	pdc_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+	if (!pdc_base) {
+		pr_err("%pOF: unable to map PDC registers\n", node->full_name);

The whole point of the %pOF specifier is that you don't pass the
full_name field, but just the node itself. This is why I pointed you to
commit ce4fecf1fe15 so that you could see how it is used...

Oops. I had seen the commit earlier, hence I didn't pay close attention
this time. Sorry, my bad.

Thanks,
Lina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux