Hi Jerome, On 01/05/2018 07:09 PM, Jerome Brunet wrote: > When a divider clock has CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY set, it means that the > register shall be left un-touched, but it does not mean the clock > should stop rate propagation if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set > okay, the statement sounds correct, but there is no such clocks on LPC32xx, thus I hardly can confirm that adding dead/inapplicable code is a fix. > This properly handled in qcom clk-regmap-divider but it was not in the > lpc32xx divider > > Fixes: f7c82a60ba26 ("clk: lpc32xx: add common clock framework driver") > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I would suggest to drop two LPC32xx clock driver changes from the series. -- With best wishes, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html