On 12/21/2017 07:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Ok. That's testable with acpi_match_device_ids() though. I can
add that into pinctrl-msm.c so we don't have to pass info about
available gpios from ACPI specific driver into the pinctrl-msm
core driver. That's why I'm trying to avoid doing it in the ACPI
specific driver. Do it close to where the gpiochip is created
instead.
I guess we're just going to have to agree to disagree. I see the DSDs
as being SOC-specific, and therefore belong in the SOC driver. I'm
still going to need an SOC driver to define the TLMM register layout.
But as I said earlier, I've already spent way too much time working on a
driver that, in all likelihood, never be used in any production system
anyway.
I look forward to reviewing the next version of your patch.
Maybe future HIDs could follow the DT design and then we can look
for the same device property name in both firmwares.
DSDs generally don't have the vendor prefix that DT properties do.
Parsing
ranges is simpler.
I'm not sure I agree with that.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
